最新的CIMA Strategic Case Study - CIMAPRO19-CS3-1免費考試真題
問題1
A further eight weeks have passed since the discussion concerning Wodd's creation of an accredited Forest Certification Service.
Wodd's Chairman has asked you to a meeting:
"I thought that we had a lucky escape over the Barry Crauder story from a recent news article, but the Government is considering modifying the tax arrangements associated with forestry. Professional forestry companies such as Wodd will continue to pay no tax on forestry profits, but private individuals such as Mr Crauder will be taxed on profits just as they would for any other business. The Government is taking this action because public opinion is against granting generous tax relief to wealthy individuals.
For the moment, this is all highly secret. The minister responsible for forestry has spoken to the chairmen of all of the major forestry companies on the basis that each gives a personal guarantee to respect the Government's confidence. The minister has done so because she is concerned that stock markets will panic when the news of the tax changes are announced next week. If the shareholders incorrectly believe that we will lose the tax shield on our profits then the share price will drop like a stone. We will be able to announce that we are aware of the changes and that we will not be taxed differently because of them.
I have spoken to the Board about this, making them promise not to repeat any of this information. We have called in and briefed the key analysts who advise the main institutional investors in Marland on the forestry industry.
As things stand, we can expect a lot of the wealthy individuals who own forests to divest themselves as soon as they discover that there are no more tax incentives. That will have significant implications for Wodd, both directly and indirectly.
The Board believes that the markets will overreact when the tax changes are first announced and that we will be unable to do much to manage that. One suggestion that has been put forward is that we should increase the dividend slightly as a signal that we are confident in the future strength of the industry. I suspect that the executive directors are just a little too concerned with the fact that they all have stock options that can only be exercised on a date that falls just after the government is due to announce its intentions on tax.
I need your thoughts in order to have an independent viewpoint from that voiced by the Board:
* What effect will the tax changes have on our business?
* Do you agree that briefing the analysts will mitigate the risk of our share price overreacting when the tax changes are announced?
* Will the additional dividend payment help to maintain the share price?
* Is granting executive stock options always a sound basis for aligning the interests of the executive directors and the shareholders?"
Wodd's Chairman has asked you to a meeting:
"I thought that we had a lucky escape over the Barry Crauder story from a recent news article, but the Government is considering modifying the tax arrangements associated with forestry. Professional forestry companies such as Wodd will continue to pay no tax on forestry profits, but private individuals such as Mr Crauder will be taxed on profits just as they would for any other business. The Government is taking this action because public opinion is against granting generous tax relief to wealthy individuals.
For the moment, this is all highly secret. The minister responsible for forestry has spoken to the chairmen of all of the major forestry companies on the basis that each gives a personal guarantee to respect the Government's confidence. The minister has done so because she is concerned that stock markets will panic when the news of the tax changes are announced next week. If the shareholders incorrectly believe that we will lose the tax shield on our profits then the share price will drop like a stone. We will be able to announce that we are aware of the changes and that we will not be taxed differently because of them.
I have spoken to the Board about this, making them promise not to repeat any of this information. We have called in and briefed the key analysts who advise the main institutional investors in Marland on the forestry industry.
As things stand, we can expect a lot of the wealthy individuals who own forests to divest themselves as soon as they discover that there are no more tax incentives. That will have significant implications for Wodd, both directly and indirectly.
The Board believes that the markets will overreact when the tax changes are first announced and that we will be unable to do much to manage that. One suggestion that has been put forward is that we should increase the dividend slightly as a signal that we are confident in the future strength of the industry. I suspect that the executive directors are just a little too concerned with the fact that they all have stock options that can only be exercised on a date that falls just after the government is due to announce its intentions on tax.
I need your thoughts in order to have an independent viewpoint from that voiced by the Board:
* What effect will the tax changes have on our business?
* Do you agree that briefing the analysts will mitigate the risk of our share price overreacting when the tax changes are announced?
* Will the additional dividend payment help to maintain the share price?
* Is granting executive stock options always a sound basis for aligning the interests of the executive directors and the shareholders?"
正確答案:
Complete your answer and submit
問題2
Six months have passed. Wodd has announced its intention to create a biomass power station in its North Forest, to be fuelled by trees from the North Forest itself and also waste biomass products from other timber land owned by Wodd in that area.
The news has received mixed reactions. Younger residents of the small towns close to North Forest were delighted because their local economy will be boosted. Older residents and those living further afield within the region complain that the power station will pollute the environment and the destruction of the North Forest will blight an area of outstanding beauty. A residents' group has been established online, with support from Marland's largest environmental lobbying group, to block the proposal.
You have received the following email from Marcus Svenson, Finance Director:
From: Marcus Svenson, Finance Director
To: Senior Finance Manager
Subject: Stakeholder issues
Hi,
I have sent you a link to the website created by the protestors against the biomass power station. This is causing serious problems because we still need to gain formal Government approval, although the Government supports biomass as an energy source as it is far cleaner and more sustainable than fossil fuel and far less controversial than nuclear. Needless to say, the press has picked up on this and is starting to run the story.
We had reached agreements in principle with Marland Bank for funding for this project and with a civil engineering contractor for the construction work, but both are now nervous about signing contracts because neither wishes to be associated with an environmental scandal.
I need two things from you.
Please draft the body of a press release that we can issue in response to the claims on the protestors' website. Add a few comments to explain what your arguments are trying to achieve (I don't want us simply to state that we disagree with the protestors, I want us to offer meaningful arguments in response). Just write your draft as part of your reply to this email and I will circulate it to the other Board members for approval before we submit it.
Please suggest some safeguards that we can put in place to enable us to retain the support of the bank and the civil engineer throughout this project.
Marcus
The news has received mixed reactions. Younger residents of the small towns close to North Forest were delighted because their local economy will be boosted. Older residents and those living further afield within the region complain that the power station will pollute the environment and the destruction of the North Forest will blight an area of outstanding beauty. A residents' group has been established online, with support from Marland's largest environmental lobbying group, to block the proposal.
You have received the following email from Marcus Svenson, Finance Director:
From: Marcus Svenson, Finance Director
To: Senior Finance Manager
Subject: Stakeholder issues
Hi,
I have sent you a link to the website created by the protestors against the biomass power station. This is causing serious problems because we still need to gain formal Government approval, although the Government supports biomass as an energy source as it is far cleaner and more sustainable than fossil fuel and far less controversial than nuclear. Needless to say, the press has picked up on this and is starting to run the story.
We had reached agreements in principle with Marland Bank for funding for this project and with a civil engineering contractor for the construction work, but both are now nervous about signing contracts because neither wishes to be associated with an environmental scandal.
I need two things from you.
Please draft the body of a press release that we can issue in response to the claims on the protestors' website. Add a few comments to explain what your arguments are trying to achieve (I don't want us simply to state that we disagree with the protestors, I want us to offer meaningful arguments in response). Just write your draft as part of your reply to this email and I will circulate it to the other Board members for approval before we submit it.
Please suggest some safeguards that we can put in place to enable us to retain the support of the bank and the civil engineer throughout this project.
Marcus
正確答案:
Complete your answer and submit
問題3
From: Jan Archibald, Group Chief Financial Officer, Fouce Oil
To: William Seaton, Director of Finance
Subject: Sale of oil fields
Dear William,
As you know, the Board of Fouce Oil is keen that you should operate in an autonomous manner. However, we believe that it is our duty to ask you to reconsider a key issue in Slide's approach to doing business.
Over the years you have been very successful indeed in finding significant oil fields and bringing those to production. We have been gratified to observe your efforts in doing so and we believe that all shareholders have benefitted from the wealth that you have created.
The Board of Fouce Oil believes that the time has come for Slide to stop giving the fruits of its labour away to other companies. We believe that Slide should retain any successful oil wells and start to earn revenues from the sale of the oil itself rather than the sale of the oil wells. We believe that the stock market would respond favourably to such a development, to the mutual benefit of all.
Best Wishes
Jan
To: William Seaton, Director of Finance
Subject: Sale of oil fields
Dear William,
As you know, the Board of Fouce Oil is keen that you should operate in an autonomous manner. However, we believe that it is our duty to ask you to reconsider a key issue in Slide's approach to doing business.
Over the years you have been very successful indeed in finding significant oil fields and bringing those to production. We have been gratified to observe your efforts in doing so and we believe that all shareholders have benefitted from the wealth that you have created.
The Board of Fouce Oil believes that the time has come for Slide to stop giving the fruits of its labour away to other companies. We believe that Slide should retain any successful oil wells and start to earn revenues from the sale of the oil itself rather than the sale of the oil wells. We believe that the stock market would respond favourably to such a development, to the mutual benefit of all.
Best Wishes
Jan
正確答案:
Complete your answer and submit
問題4
A month has passed since you submitted the report requested by William Seaton, Director of Finance on the Board's proposals.
You have received the following email:
From: William Seaton, Director of Finance
To: Finance Manager
Subject: Shale oil
Hi,
One of the geologists made a presentation to the Board, proposing that we investigate the extraction of shale oil deposits. I have attached the slides that were used as the basis for this presentation.
I need you to work on a response to this document:
* Firstly, what risks do you envisage in our entry to the shale oil business?
* Secondly, what do you regard as the key factors that we should consider when deciding on proceeding with this proposal? Please justify your selection.
* Thirdly, what factors should we take into account when deciding on which country or countries to commence this side of the business?
* Finally, what are the challenges in creating a team of technical staff to lead our efforts in this area?
William
The presentation slides can be found by clicking on the Reference Materials button.
You have received the following email:
From: William Seaton, Director of Finance
To: Finance Manager
Subject: Shale oil
Hi,
One of the geologists made a presentation to the Board, proposing that we investigate the extraction of shale oil deposits. I have attached the slides that were used as the basis for this presentation.
I need you to work on a response to this document:
* Firstly, what risks do you envisage in our entry to the shale oil business?
* Secondly, what do you regard as the key factors that we should consider when deciding on proceeding with this proposal? Please justify your selection.
* Thirdly, what factors should we take into account when deciding on which country or countries to commence this side of the business?
* Finally, what are the challenges in creating a team of technical staff to lead our efforts in this area?
William
The presentation slides can be found by clicking on the Reference Materials button.
正確答案:
Complete your answer and submit
問題5
The formal merger with Darrell has been negotiated and the legal formalities have been completed. The two company management teams are working on the integration of the two businesses.
You receive an email from Peter Sorchi, the Chief Executive of the merged company:
From: Peter Sorchi, Chief Executive Officer
To: Senior Finance Manager
Subject: Integration of IT and treasury
Hi,
I need you to advise me on a couple of matters. The attached press clipping shows how sensitive this is.
We need to integrate the IT and treasury functions of the former Wodd and Darrell. I thought that it would be a simple matter of identifying the common ground and slimming down both companies' departments to cover the new entity, but I have the heads of both IT and treasury from each company arguing that their approaches are better for the merged group and that they should take the lead.
Wodd's Treasurer claims to be an expert in natural hedging of currency risks and Darrell's argues that her department was highly successful because it makes excellent use of derivatives for hedging. Both agree only on the fact that they cannot work together. I am afraid that I have to agree with them on that and the Board will have the difficult decision of choosing between them.
I have the opposite problem with the IT function. The two Heads of IT are excited to be able to combine their databases and to develop their respective interests in Big Dat a. They claim that we should retain all of the professional staff in both departments and possibly even expand the merged IT Department beyond that. Given the rationalisation in all of our other functions, I do not think that we can agree to that, but I would hate to throw away a worthwhile opportunity.
Please give me your thoughts on the following:
* What approach to hedging is more likely to meet our needs: natural hedging or heavy use of derivatives?
* Ignoring hedging, what other factors should we consider in deciding between the two treasurers?
* Are the two heads of IT likely to be correct in arguing that we need to retain all existing IT staff in order to exploit synergies in data, particularly opportunities to leverage Big Data?
* What would the challenges be in motivating them to reduce their joint staffing levels and how might we deal with these?
Peter
You receive an email from Peter Sorchi, the Chief Executive of the merged company:
From: Peter Sorchi, Chief Executive Officer
To: Senior Finance Manager
Subject: Integration of IT and treasury
Hi,
I need you to advise me on a couple of matters. The attached press clipping shows how sensitive this is.
We need to integrate the IT and treasury functions of the former Wodd and Darrell. I thought that it would be a simple matter of identifying the common ground and slimming down both companies' departments to cover the new entity, but I have the heads of both IT and treasury from each company arguing that their approaches are better for the merged group and that they should take the lead.
Wodd's Treasurer claims to be an expert in natural hedging of currency risks and Darrell's argues that her department was highly successful because it makes excellent use of derivatives for hedging. Both agree only on the fact that they cannot work together. I am afraid that I have to agree with them on that and the Board will have the difficult decision of choosing between them.
I have the opposite problem with the IT function. The two Heads of IT are excited to be able to combine their databases and to develop their respective interests in Big Dat a. They claim that we should retain all of the professional staff in both departments and possibly even expand the merged IT Department beyond that. Given the rationalisation in all of our other functions, I do not think that we can agree to that, but I would hate to throw away a worthwhile opportunity.
Please give me your thoughts on the following:
* What approach to hedging is more likely to meet our needs: natural hedging or heavy use of derivatives?
* Ignoring hedging, what other factors should we consider in deciding between the two treasurers?
* Are the two heads of IT likely to be correct in arguing that we need to retain all existing IT staff in order to exploit synergies in data, particularly opportunities to leverage Big Data?
* What would the challenges be in motivating them to reduce their joint staffing levels and how might we deal with these?
Peter
正確答案:
Complete your answer and submit
